Comments & Editorials

EPA Proposal

Dust Sources at Mono Lake

Mono Basin Progress Reports:
2001
2004 (data)

Local Residents' 1993 Testimony to SWRCB

WebCam Images of Dust Storms

Current Mono Lake WebCam Image

DustCams:

Download Owens Dust Movies

Yosemite Air Quality Cam

Current Map of Dust Pollution Nationwide

American Lung Association

 

NEW: MONO LAKE DUSTCAM!

9/21/06 UPDATE:

VICTORY!
EPA abandons effort to eliminate air quality standards at Mono Lake!

Mono Lake supporters made a difference!

Thanks to Mono Lake supporters, the EPA
heard loud and clear that the severe air pollution
problem at Mono Lake MUST remain subject to federal
regulations. EPA heard our concerns for Mono Lake, and they listened.

Today, September 21, EPA announced that they would
make NO CHANGES to the standards that apply at Mono Lake!

While you may hear news of controversy over other
particulate regulations, which are generally more
relevant to urban areas, you can be proud that Mono
Lake remains protected.

Background

Earlier this year, the Environmental Protection
Agency proposed to change the nation's clean air
standards--and leave Mono Lake in the dust!
The EPA was considering eliminating regulatory
standards for windblown dust––just the kind that
comes off the exposed bed of Mono Lake. The EPA
also considered abandoning the relevant
“PM10 particulate” regulations in rural areas
across the country, including the Mono Basin.

Tremendous controversy and public outcry forced EPA
to abandon those proposals. In the final
regulations, the EPA left the Mono Lake standards
unchanged!

 

Proposed EPA Rule Change Would Have Stripped Federal Air Quality Protection From Mono Lake, Owens Lake, and Rural America

Thank you for making your voice heard before
the comment period ended!

The Mono Basin and the Owens Valley are the worst sources of windblown dust pollution in the United States--with concentrations during dust storms exceeding the federal standard by 10-70 times. Dust storms originate on dry lake bed areas exposed by excessive water diversions to the City of Los Angeles. Not only is this dust a threat to human health because the dust particle sizes are so small that they pass through the nose and throat and get directly into people’s lungs, but the dust contains toxins such as arsenic, cadmium, nickel, and sulfate salts. Currently, a working solution is in place to solve these Eastern Sierra air pollution problems and attain the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for safe air quality. Under a new proposal, those standards themselves would dry up and blow away.

Unfortunately, just a few days before Christmas 2005 the EPA introduced amendments to the rule for particulate matter (PM) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The amendments would entirely remove the existing particulate regulations in rural areas – and replace them with nothing. That's right: there would be no federal particulate standard left to meet at Owens or Mono lakes! Based on the PM rule changes there would be no protection for citizens living in cities or town with less than 100,000 people—37% of the US population. The EPA is charged with upholding the interests of the public; however, this amendment unfairly disregards the health of people living in and visiting rural areas.

The current EPA regulation provides a science based standard for measuring and regulating levels of dust in the air, and mitigation work at Mono and Owens lakes would eventually achieve safe air quality standards under the current rule. The proposed changes would undermine these successful solutions that are already improving the quality of the air that residents and visitors breathe. The current standards are a cornerstone in these long-fought environmental solutions. The proposed changes have serious implications for all of rural America, and threaten to unravel decades of progress at Mono Lake and Owens Lake.

Thank You for Speaking on Mono Lake's Behalf!

  • The comment period ended April 17, 2006.

  • Mono Lake Committee members received an action alert including a sample letter by mail in the second half of March. For those that signed it and sent it in to the Mono Lake Committee before the deadline – we delivered it to the EPA for you!

  • Your own letter in your own words is valuable! To see where letters were sent by mail, click here for a sample letter and information about where to send it.

  • If you have questions, you can contact the Mono Lake Committee directly at (760) 647-6595.


Back to Policy Page

boleft.jpg (5147 bytes) Mono Lake Home Mono Lake Committee Members' Section Help the Mono Lake Committee Recent news at Mono Lake Table of Contents Search the Mono Lake site boright.jpg (5170 bytes)